Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Answers
As opposed to other forms of dispute resolution such as mediation and arbitration...?
Q. ...who would benefit the most from litigation?
Asked by Cheekedee - Mon Oct 13 16:53:12 2008 - Law & Ethics - 1 Answers - Comments
A. The winner, but you would still incur legal fees.
Answered by jpc458 - Mon Oct 13 17:00:45 2008
Q. ...who would benefit the most from litigation?
Asked by Cheekedee - Mon Oct 13 16:53:12 2008 - Law & Ethics - 1 Answers - Comments
A. The winner, but you would still incur legal fees.
Answered by jpc458 - Mon Oct 13 17:00:45 2008
Does each State have its own Residential Tenancies Act?
Q. I'm interested in knowing how Canada's landlord/tenant system differs from the U.S. In Canada each province has its own Residential Tenancies Act that is law. Both landlords and tenants must abide by this Act in their respective province. Tenancy agreements must comply to the letter with these Acts. If there is a dispute, the tenant or landlord does not take the other to small claims court. They apply for 'dispute resolution' or 'arbitration'. Disputes are settled by an arbitrator, not a judge. The arbitrator's decision is law. How is it set up in the United States? Is there a 'residential tenancies act' in each state? Are disputes resolved in small claims court [like People's Court, Judge Alex, Judge Judy] or by some other means? Is there… [cont.]
Asked by beagle - Wed Dec 30 10:42:01 2009 - Renting & Real Estate - 2 Answers - Comments
A. Every state has a different landlord/tenant statute set. usually disputes end up in small claims courts. Overriding legality is generally determined by the terms and conditions of the lease agreement.
Answered by wizjp - Wed Dec 30 10:55:04 2009
Q. I'm interested in knowing how Canada's landlord/tenant system differs from the U.S. In Canada each province has its own Residential Tenancies Act that is law. Both landlords and tenants must abide by this Act in their respective province. Tenancy agreements must comply to the letter with these Acts. If there is a dispute, the tenant or landlord does not take the other to small claims court. They apply for 'dispute resolution' or 'arbitration'. Disputes are settled by an arbitrator, not a judge. The arbitrator's decision is law. How is it set up in the United States? Is there a 'residential tenancies act' in each state? Are disputes resolved in small claims court [like People's Court, Judge Alex, Judge Judy] or by some other means? Is there… [cont.]
Asked by beagle - Wed Dec 30 10:42:01 2009 - Renting & Real Estate - 2 Answers - Comments
A. Every state has a different landlord/tenant statute set. usually disputes end up in small claims courts. Overriding legality is generally determined by the terms and conditions of the lease agreement.
Answered by wizjp - Wed Dec 30 10:55:04 2009
Which Diploma should I choose? Please... Help!!!?
Q. 1. Diploma in Labour Law and Labour Welfare 2. Diploma in Medical Jurisprudence & Forensic Science. 3. Diploma in cyber Law 4. Diploma in Environmental Law. 5. Diploma in Intellectual Property Laws. 6. Diploma in International Business Law and Corporate Law in India. 7. Diploma in Criminology and Penology 8. Diploma in Human Rights Jurisprudence 9. Diploma in Arbitration Conciliation and Alternate Dispute Resolution System. These are the Diplomas available in my University.. (I'm doing bba llb right now). Please, help me choose one as I cannot do more that one a year (thats the rule) Which one do you think is the most important of all! Thanks in advance! :-)
Asked by Asad - Thu Jun 25 07:26:57 2009 - Law & Ethics - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Depends on what you plan on doing when you have finished your studies - cyber law sounds interesting...
Answered by Mu1 - Thu Jun 25 07:32:57 2009
Q. 1. Diploma in Labour Law and Labour Welfare 2. Diploma in Medical Jurisprudence & Forensic Science. 3. Diploma in cyber Law 4. Diploma in Environmental Law. 5. Diploma in Intellectual Property Laws. 6. Diploma in International Business Law and Corporate Law in India. 7. Diploma in Criminology and Penology 8. Diploma in Human Rights Jurisprudence 9. Diploma in Arbitration Conciliation and Alternate Dispute Resolution System. These are the Diplomas available in my University.. (I'm doing bba llb right now). Please, help me choose one as I cannot do more that one a year (thats the rule) Which one do you think is the most important of all! Thanks in advance! :-)
Asked by Asad - Thu Jun 25 07:26:57 2009 - Law & Ethics - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Depends on what you plan on doing when you have finished your studies - cyber law sounds interesting...
Answered by Mu1 - Thu Jun 25 07:32:57 2009
Kim and Lou agree to dissolve their partnership but cannot agree on the division of assets and pro?
Q. Kim and Lou agree to dissolve their partnership but cannot agree on the division of assets and profits. They decide to mediate their dispute. The advantages of mediation include 1. lower cost than arbitration. 2. resolutions that benefit both sides. 3. the speed with which a dispute can be resolved, compared to arbitration. 4. all of the choices.
Asked by Christina R - Thu Sep 25 19:54:56 2008 - Corporations - 1 Answers - Comments
A. 4. all of the choices.
Answered by S-Dot - Thu Sep 25 19:58:40 2008
Q. Kim and Lou agree to dissolve their partnership but cannot agree on the division of assets and profits. They decide to mediate their dispute. The advantages of mediation include 1. lower cost than arbitration. 2. resolutions that benefit both sides. 3. the speed with which a dispute can be resolved, compared to arbitration. 4. all of the choices.
Asked by Christina R - Thu Sep 25 19:54:56 2008 - Corporations - 1 Answers - Comments
A. 4. all of the choices.
Answered by S-Dot - Thu Sep 25 19:58:40 2008
Hello there, can you help me here?
Q. English is my second language and i'm forcing myself to understand this, Can anyone be able to translate or make it easier for me to understand. I'm 72 years old. Thank You. Also It will be helpful if you have any Information about use of International Trade terms and Why does the Import/Export business use these terms along with other industry terminology? International contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with resolution of disputes with determine : - where dispute, in the absence of amicable settlement, should be litigated ; - how disputes should be resolved ( by courts of law or by arbitration ) ; and - which law or rules of law should be applied. Second part the contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with… [cont.]
Asked by nbf - Thu Dec 11 23:07:00 2008 - Other - Advertising & Marketing - 1 Answers - Comments
A. www.cbsa.gc.ca
Answered by light - Sun Dec 14 23:37:35 2008
Q. English is my second language and i'm forcing myself to understand this, Can anyone be able to translate or make it easier for me to understand. I'm 72 years old. Thank You. Also It will be helpful if you have any Information about use of International Trade terms and Why does the Import/Export business use these terms along with other industry terminology? International contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with resolution of disputes with determine : - where dispute, in the absence of amicable settlement, should be litigated ; - how disputes should be resolved ( by courts of law or by arbitration ) ; and - which law or rules of law should be applied. Second part the contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with… [cont.]
Asked by nbf - Thu Dec 11 23:07:00 2008 - Other - Advertising & Marketing - 1 Answers - Comments
A. www.cbsa.gc.ca
Answered by light - Sun Dec 14 23:37:35 2008
Please help!!!?
Q. 1.What is the source of federal court system s power? 2.What is the function of the state intermediate appellate? Explain your answer. 3.What is the different between a civil case and a criminal case? Explain your answer 4.What is involved in alternative dispute resolution? Explain your answer. 5.What is involved in mediation and how does it differ from arbitration? 6.What are pleadings and how are they involved in a lawsuit? 7.What is an injunction? Explain your answer. 8.What are damages and how are they involved in a lawsuit? Explain your answer. 9.How do criminal cases begin? 10.What is bail?
Asked by Exodus - Wed Feb 11 10:56:27 2009 - Law & Ethics - 7 Answers - Comments
A. 1. The federal court system gets its power from the us dept of justice. 2. The state intermediate appellate functions to lessen the number of trials going to the district circuit courts. It reviews them and only sends those with merit. 3. A civil case has plaintiff and defendant, and cannot result in jail time. In the civil case, the plaintiff can recieve a judgement of funds from the defendant. Criminal case has prosecutor and defendant, and can result in jail time. 4. An alternative dispute is where the plaintiff and defendant work out their issue privately, and it is approved via contract by a judge. 5. Mediation is overseen by a judge, whereas an arbitration is stipulated by a judge. 6. Pleadings are involved in revieving and sending… [cont.]
Answered by Eric F - Wed Feb 11 11:12:56 2009
Q. 1.What is the source of federal court system s power? 2.What is the function of the state intermediate appellate? Explain your answer. 3.What is the different between a civil case and a criminal case? Explain your answer 4.What is involved in alternative dispute resolution? Explain your answer. 5.What is involved in mediation and how does it differ from arbitration? 6.What are pleadings and how are they involved in a lawsuit? 7.What is an injunction? Explain your answer. 8.What are damages and how are they involved in a lawsuit? Explain your answer. 9.How do criminal cases begin? 10.What is bail?
Asked by Exodus - Wed Feb 11 10:56:27 2009 - Law & Ethics - 7 Answers - Comments
A. 1. The federal court system gets its power from the us dept of justice. 2. The state intermediate appellate functions to lessen the number of trials going to the district circuit courts. It reviews them and only sends those with merit. 3. A civil case has plaintiff and defendant, and cannot result in jail time. In the civil case, the plaintiff can recieve a judgement of funds from the defendant. Criminal case has prosecutor and defendant, and can result in jail time. 4. An alternative dispute is where the plaintiff and defendant work out their issue privately, and it is approved via contract by a judge. 5. Mediation is overseen by a judge, whereas an arbitration is stipulated by a judge. 6. Pleadings are involved in revieving and sending… [cont.]
Answered by Eric F - Wed Feb 11 11:12:56 2009
What does this petition mean?
Q. Before you read, I would like someone to break this down to me clearly, because the man that sent me this is an extremely important person to me who I care about very dearly, he is my mentor. Is it basically saying that the people that sue for little things like having tree limbs over the neighbors yard and want to sue for that or having a neighbors dog go pee in their yard and want the dog executed. Or something else?? Hi, Recently, I've been learning about a dangerous way for employers and companies to avoid being accountable to employees and consumers. I'm talking about forced arbitration - a practice which traps employees and consumers into waiving their rights to sue, participate in a class-action lawsuit, or to appeal an unfair… [cont.]
Asked by King Wide Receiver - Sun Apr 26 14:37:11 2009 - Other - Politics & Government - 2 Answers - Comments
A. It's exactly the opposite of your theory. This petition is to preserve our right to stand up for our rights in a court of law, rather than being forced into an unregulated kangaroo court administered by a private person or company. The court is the final and most potent defense in the preservation of our rights as citizens. It's a tradition that goes back to the Magna Carta, and must be preserved at all costs. To lose your right to be heard in an open court of law is the end of freedom as we know it.. this petition addresses the beginning of a dangerous slippery slope, and I would support it completely. Your mentor is a wise person, and you are lucky to know them. I hope they are a Libertarian!
Answered by LasVegasPasses.com - Sun Apr 26 14:51:03 2009
Q. Before you read, I would like someone to break this down to me clearly, because the man that sent me this is an extremely important person to me who I care about very dearly, he is my mentor. Is it basically saying that the people that sue for little things like having tree limbs over the neighbors yard and want to sue for that or having a neighbors dog go pee in their yard and want the dog executed. Or something else?? Hi, Recently, I've been learning about a dangerous way for employers and companies to avoid being accountable to employees and consumers. I'm talking about forced arbitration - a practice which traps employees and consumers into waiving their rights to sue, participate in a class-action lawsuit, or to appeal an unfair… [cont.]
Asked by King Wide Receiver - Sun Apr 26 14:37:11 2009 - Other - Politics & Government - 2 Answers - Comments
A. It's exactly the opposite of your theory. This petition is to preserve our right to stand up for our rights in a court of law, rather than being forced into an unregulated kangaroo court administered by a private person or company. The court is the final and most potent defense in the preservation of our rights as citizens. It's a tradition that goes back to the Magna Carta, and must be preserved at all costs. To lose your right to be heard in an open court of law is the end of freedom as we know it.. this petition addresses the beginning of a dangerous slippery slope, and I would support it completely. Your mentor is a wise person, and you are lucky to know them. I hope they are a Libertarian!
Answered by LasVegasPasses.com - Sun Apr 26 14:51:03 2009
is it legal for my company to make me sign an employee dispute resolution plan?
Q. " employees agree to resolve all disputes through the mediation and binding arbitration process described herein instead of through the court system." Where the company picks and pays for the mediator/arbitrator.
Asked by - Tue Jun 28 23:10:31 2011 - Law & Legal - 4 Answers - Comments
A. The only way it would be "illegal" is if your state has a specific statute that prohibits such a clause, or more specifically, the associated language within the clause(s). The reason is that Mediation and ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) has become so popular in commercial/employment disputes, is that it offers a confidential, efficient and inexpensive solution to disputes, for all the parties involved. Now... all that said... I am a bit troubled by your statement that the "company picks and pays for the mediator/arbitrator." Language to that effect in any agreement would constitute a potential conflict of interest, out-of-the-gate. True Mediators and Neutrals, who have been trained and qualified in their field of… [cont.]
Answered by - Wed Jun 29 09:13:25 2011
Q. " employees agree to resolve all disputes through the mediation and binding arbitration process described herein instead of through the court system." Where the company picks and pays for the mediator/arbitrator.
Asked by - Tue Jun 28 23:10:31 2011 - Law & Legal - 4 Answers - Comments
A. The only way it would be "illegal" is if your state has a specific statute that prohibits such a clause, or more specifically, the associated language within the clause(s). The reason is that Mediation and ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) has become so popular in commercial/employment disputes, is that it offers a confidential, efficient and inexpensive solution to disputes, for all the parties involved. Now... all that said... I am a bit troubled by your statement that the "company picks and pays for the mediator/arbitrator." Language to that effect in any agreement would constitute a potential conflict of interest, out-of-the-gate. True Mediators and Neutrals, who have been trained and qualified in their field of… [cont.]
Answered by - Wed Jun 29 09:13:25 2011
Forget Hollywood You'll Never Get Laid By 1 Of Them So Help Me With Law Class PLZ?
Q. 1.Utilitarianism can be defined as: a). a moral theory that individuals should decide what is ethical based on their own moral compass. b). a theory that people must choose the actions or follow the rules of the greatest good of society. c). as a moral theory that dictates that people have a moral duty based on the universal rules of the greatest good. d). as a moral theory that states that moral duties are based on an implied social contract. Answer: ___ 2.Which one of the following groupings of entities both do not offer limitations on liability? a). general partnerships and sole proprietorships b). corporations and general partnerships c). corporations and limited liability companies d). corporations and limited partnerships e).limited… [cont.]
Asked by - Tue Sep 22 16:18:37 2009 - Celebrities - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Nobody has time to help you with your homework. We have things to do.
Answered by His dear, lovesong :: got me going CRAZY - Tue Sep 22 16:27:12 2009
Q. 1.Utilitarianism can be defined as: a). a moral theory that individuals should decide what is ethical based on their own moral compass. b). a theory that people must choose the actions or follow the rules of the greatest good of society. c). as a moral theory that dictates that people have a moral duty based on the universal rules of the greatest good. d). as a moral theory that states that moral duties are based on an implied social contract. Answer: ___ 2.Which one of the following groupings of entities both do not offer limitations on liability? a). general partnerships and sole proprietorships b). corporations and general partnerships c). corporations and limited liability companies d). corporations and limited partnerships e).limited… [cont.]
Asked by - Tue Sep 22 16:18:37 2009 - Celebrities - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Nobody has time to help you with your homework. We have things to do.
Answered by His dear, lovesong :: got me going CRAZY - Tue Sep 22 16:27:12 2009
Hello there, can you help me here?
Q. English is my second language and i'm forcing myself to understand this, Can anyone be able to translate or make it easier for me to understand. I'm 72 years old. Thank You. Also It will be helpful if you have any Information about use of International Trade terms and Why does the Import/Export business use these terms along with other industry terminology? International contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with resolution of disputes with determine : - where dispute, in the absence of amicable settlement, should be litigated ; - how disputes should be resolved ( by courts of law or by arbitration ) ; and - which law or rules of law should be applied. Second part the contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with… [cont.]
Asked by nbf - Thu Dec 11 23:05:00 2008 - Words & Wordplay - 2 Answers - Comments
A. www.cbsa.gc.ca
Answered by light - Sun Dec 14 23:38:56 2008
Q. English is my second language and i'm forcing myself to understand this, Can anyone be able to translate or make it easier for me to understand. I'm 72 years old. Thank You. Also It will be helpful if you have any Information about use of International Trade terms and Why does the Import/Export business use these terms along with other industry terminology? International contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with resolution of disputes with determine : - where dispute, in the absence of amicable settlement, should be litigated ; - how disputes should be resolved ( by courts of law or by arbitration ) ; and - which law or rules of law should be applied. Second part the contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with… [cont.]
Asked by nbf - Thu Dec 11 23:05:00 2008 - Words & Wordplay - 2 Answers - Comments
A. www.cbsa.gc.ca
Answered by light - Sun Dec 14 23:38:56 2008
Advantages and disadvantages of arbitration as a dispute resolution method by comparison with litigation.?
Q. Thank you, a postgraduate now researching in1996 English Abitration Law from a law school in China.
Asked by - Fri Nov 4 01:40:28 2011 - Law & Ethics - 1 Answers - Comments
Q. Thank you, a postgraduate now researching in1996 English Abitration Law from a law school in China.
Asked by - Fri Nov 4 01:40:28 2011 - Law & Ethics - 1 Answers - Comments
I have the following labour law question,please help?
Q. 1 discuss and distinguish mediation and adjudication as methods of dispute resolution 2 Briefly explain what the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration is and outline how it operates in regard to the resolution of labour disputes.
Asked by Purruza - Thu Sep 18 14:08:15 2008 - Homework Help - 1 Answers - Comments
A. I believe this is an American question, but if this any help, in England we have a body called acas that does the same function , it is an organisation that is signed up to by opposing factions , acas then look into both sides arguments as presented to them with any evidence they have then they can and will find for one side and the decision is final, but if arguments are not based on evidence but on right then they can act on conciliation trying to bring both sides to a place where they can see each others side of the argument, they can do this for large company's or indviduals, hth
Answered by Butch UK - Thu Sep 18 14:24:06 2008
Q. 1 discuss and distinguish mediation and adjudication as methods of dispute resolution 2 Briefly explain what the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration is and outline how it operates in regard to the resolution of labour disputes.
Asked by Purruza - Thu Sep 18 14:08:15 2008 - Homework Help - 1 Answers - Comments
A. I believe this is an American question, but if this any help, in England we have a body called acas that does the same function , it is an organisation that is signed up to by opposing factions , acas then look into both sides arguments as presented to them with any evidence they have then they can and will find for one side and the decision is final, but if arguments are not based on evidence but on right then they can act on conciliation trying to bring both sides to a place where they can see each others side of the argument, they can do this for large company's or indviduals, hth
Answered by Butch UK - Thu Sep 18 14:24:06 2008
Hello there, can you help me here?
Q. English is my second language and i'm forcing myself to understand this, Can anyone be able to translate or make it easier for me to understand. I'm 72 years old. Thank You. Also It will be helpful if you have any Information about use of International Trade terms and Why does the Import/Export business use these terms along with other industry terminology? International contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with resolution of disputes with determine : - where dispute, in the absence of amicable settlement, should be litigated ; - how disputes should be resolved ( by courts of law or by arbitration ) ; and - which law or rules of law should be applied. Second part the contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with… [cont.]
Asked by nbf - Thu Dec 11 23:05:59 2008 - Other - Business & Finance - 4 Answers - Comments
A. www.cbsa.gc.ca
Answered by light - Sun Dec 14 23:38:29 2008
Q. English is my second language and i'm forcing myself to understand this, Can anyone be able to translate or make it easier for me to understand. I'm 72 years old. Thank You. Also It will be helpful if you have any Information about use of International Trade terms and Why does the Import/Export business use these terms along with other industry terminology? International contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with resolution of disputes with determine : - where dispute, in the absence of amicable settlement, should be litigated ; - how disputes should be resolved ( by courts of law or by arbitration ) ; and - which law or rules of law should be applied. Second part the contracts of sale usually contain terms dealing with… [cont.]
Asked by nbf - Thu Dec 11 23:05:59 2008 - Other - Business & Finance - 4 Answers - Comments
A. www.cbsa.gc.ca
Answered by light - Sun Dec 14 23:38:29 2008
Is an agreement between a hindu husband and wife to refer all future matrimonial disputes to arbitration valid
Q. Is such an agreement opposed to public policy ? Is the law of contracts not applicable between husband and wife ? Is an agreement to be bound by Alternative Dispute Resolution ( ADR ) in case of future matrimonial dispute valid under Hindu Law ? Clarification : I am not asking whether a matrimonial dispute can be settled in Family Court or Civil Court, my question is whether an Arbitration Agreement is Valid between husband and wife ? Secondly, is it not true that after Hindu Marriage Act, a hindu marriage is no more purely sacramental but quasi-contractual since it requires free consent and provides for divorce ?
Asked by - Sun Aug 26 23:48:30 2007 - Marriage & Divorce - 12 Answers - Comments
A. Firstly the marriage in general in India is a sacramental ceremony not a contractual obligation. Secondly the matrimonial disputes are being heard in the family courts which are formed on the basis of the Family Courts Act, 1984. The Preamble of this Act provides: - An Act to provide for the establishment of Family Courts with a view to promote conciliation in, and secure speedy settlement of, disputes relating to marriage and family affairs and for matters connected therewith. Section 7 of the Act provides: - Jurisdiction (1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall- (a) have and exercise all the jurisdiction exercisable by any district court or any subordinate civil court under any law for the time being in force… [cont.]
Answered by vijay m Indian Lawyer - Mon Aug 27 00:55:38 2007
Q. Is such an agreement opposed to public policy ? Is the law of contracts not applicable between husband and wife ? Is an agreement to be bound by Alternative Dispute Resolution ( ADR ) in case of future matrimonial dispute valid under Hindu Law ? Clarification : I am not asking whether a matrimonial dispute can be settled in Family Court or Civil Court, my question is whether an Arbitration Agreement is Valid between husband and wife ? Secondly, is it not true that after Hindu Marriage Act, a hindu marriage is no more purely sacramental but quasi-contractual since it requires free consent and provides for divorce ?
Asked by - Sun Aug 26 23:48:30 2007 - Marriage & Divorce - 12 Answers - Comments
A. Firstly the marriage in general in India is a sacramental ceremony not a contractual obligation. Secondly the matrimonial disputes are being heard in the family courts which are formed on the basis of the Family Courts Act, 1984. The Preamble of this Act provides: - An Act to provide for the establishment of Family Courts with a view to promote conciliation in, and secure speedy settlement of, disputes relating to marriage and family affairs and for matters connected therewith. Section 7 of the Act provides: - Jurisdiction (1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall- (a) have and exercise all the jurisdiction exercisable by any district court or any subordinate civil court under any law for the time being in force… [cont.]
Answered by vijay m Indian Lawyer - Mon Aug 27 00:55:38 2007
Where can I find recent cases of arbitration here in Philippines and in other country?
Q. Where can I find recent cases of arbitration(Alternative dispute resolution) here in Philippines and in other country @Michael, our teacher had instructed us to search for "arbitration cases" domestically and internationally. I really do know if it means cases resolved by the courts involving arbitration or cases which are actually resolved by an arbitrator, I believe my teacher is looking for the latter.
Asked by - Fri Nov 18 08:37:52 2011 - Law & Ethics - 1 Answers - Comments
A. What do you need? Specifically? Try Westlaw or Lexisnexis
Answered by - Fri Nov 18 08:44:17 2011
Q. Where can I find recent cases of arbitration(Alternative dispute resolution) here in Philippines and in other country @Michael, our teacher had instructed us to search for "arbitration cases" domestically and internationally. I really do know if it means cases resolved by the courts involving arbitration or cases which are actually resolved by an arbitrator, I believe my teacher is looking for the latter.
Asked by - Fri Nov 18 08:37:52 2011 - Law & Ethics - 1 Answers - Comments
A. What do you need? Specifically? Try Westlaw or Lexisnexis
Answered by - Fri Nov 18 08:44:17 2011
Dispute Resolution Agreement is this fair?
Q. well we got a dispute resolution agreement, but everyone is hesitent to sign. Why? I quote: "Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to preclude or excuse a party from bringing and adminstrative claim before any agency in order to fufill the party's obligation to exhaust administrative remedies before making a claim in arbiration. Disputes that may nto be subject to pre-dispute arbitration agreement as provided by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 111-203) are excluded from the voverage of this Agreement. This agreement shall not be construed to require the arbitration of any claims agaist a contractor that may not be subject of a mandatory arbitration agreement as proved by section 8116 of… [cont.]
Asked by - Thu Jun 23 02:49:13 2011 - Law & Ethics - 1 Answers - Comments
A. You don't have to sign it...but if you don't, you'll have to find another job.
Answered by - Fri Jun 24 07:35:30 2011
Q. well we got a dispute resolution agreement, but everyone is hesitent to sign. Why? I quote: "Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to preclude or excuse a party from bringing and adminstrative claim before any agency in order to fufill the party's obligation to exhaust administrative remedies before making a claim in arbiration. Disputes that may nto be subject to pre-dispute arbitration agreement as provided by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 111-203) are excluded from the voverage of this Agreement. This agreement shall not be construed to require the arbitration of any claims agaist a contractor that may not be subject of a mandatory arbitration agreement as proved by section 8116 of… [cont.]
Asked by - Thu Jun 23 02:49:13 2011 - Law & Ethics - 1 Answers - Comments
A. You don't have to sign it...but if you don't, you'll have to find another job.
Answered by - Fri Jun 24 07:35:30 2011
Help With My Law Class Homework (I Dont Want To Fail)?
Q. 1.Utilitarianism can be defined as: a). a moral theory that individuals should decide what is ethical based on their own moral compass. b). a theory that people must choose the actions or follow the rules of the greatest good of society. c). as a moral theory that dictates that people have a moral duty based on the universal rules of the greatest good. d). as a moral theory that states that moral duties are based on an implied social contract. Answer: ___ 2.Which one of the following groupings of entities both do not offer limitations on liability? a). general partnerships and sole proprietorships b). corporations and general partnerships c). corporations and limited liability companies d). corporations and limited partnerships e).limited… [cont.]
Asked by - Tue Sep 22 16:12:51 2009 - Other - Education - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Google your own life questions like the rest of us
Answered by Lola. - Tue Sep 22 16:16:14 2009
Q. 1.Utilitarianism can be defined as: a). a moral theory that individuals should decide what is ethical based on their own moral compass. b). a theory that people must choose the actions or follow the rules of the greatest good of society. c). as a moral theory that dictates that people have a moral duty based on the universal rules of the greatest good. d). as a moral theory that states that moral duties are based on an implied social contract. Answer: ___ 2.Which one of the following groupings of entities both do not offer limitations on liability? a). general partnerships and sole proprietorships b). corporations and general partnerships c). corporations and limited liability companies d). corporations and limited partnerships e).limited… [cont.]
Asked by - Tue Sep 22 16:12:51 2009 - Other - Education - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Google your own life questions like the rest of us
Answered by Lola. - Tue Sep 22 16:16:14 2009
Does the modern State of Israel have a 'right to exist' other than the UN resolution that created it?
Q. There appears to be a lot of ambiguity on the issue in Y/Q/A! Many askers and answerers attempt to superimpose the existence of modern Israel on ownership issues settled by the Romans during the Jewish rebellion and afterward. During 20 intervening centuries ownership was mostly the Arab [Muslim] of the family tree traceable by DNA. A brief interval involved European Crusaders ending with the fall of Acre almost a thousand years ago. Between 100ce and 1947 did the State of Israel have a right to exist [even though it didn't]? If not, does it follow the only legitimacy for the modern State of Israel is the UN resolution creating it? Were the boundaries of the modern legitimate State of Israel established by the UN resolution? Do those… [cont.]
Asked by Jack P - Mon Jul 19 12:20:56 2010 - Current Events - 7 Answers - Comments
A. The UN resolution that created Israel is illegal and should never of been granted. How can other nations decide that someone will live in YOUR home? I liken this situation to american citizens living in america, voting for our (UK) prime minister. Its madness. They gave Israel an inch and they stole a mile
Answered by OneDrop - Mon Jul 19 14:52:58 2010
Q. There appears to be a lot of ambiguity on the issue in Y/Q/A! Many askers and answerers attempt to superimpose the existence of modern Israel on ownership issues settled by the Romans during the Jewish rebellion and afterward. During 20 intervening centuries ownership was mostly the Arab [Muslim] of the family tree traceable by DNA. A brief interval involved European Crusaders ending with the fall of Acre almost a thousand years ago. Between 100ce and 1947 did the State of Israel have a right to exist [even though it didn't]? If not, does it follow the only legitimacy for the modern State of Israel is the UN resolution creating it? Were the boundaries of the modern legitimate State of Israel established by the UN resolution? Do those… [cont.]
Asked by Jack P - Mon Jul 19 12:20:56 2010 - Current Events - 7 Answers - Comments
A. The UN resolution that created Israel is illegal and should never of been granted. How can other nations decide that someone will live in YOUR home? I liken this situation to american citizens living in america, voting for our (UK) prime minister. Its madness. They gave Israel an inch and they stole a mile
Answered by OneDrop - Mon Jul 19 14:52:58 2010
Arbitration is the best and civilised mode of dispute resolution, is it not ?
Q. In arbitration there is no corruption, it is less expensive and less time consuming.
Asked by pathy - Sat Jul 19 00:34:27 2008 - Law & Ethics - 4 Answers - Comments
A. Not necessarily. But I'll let you do your own homework.
Answered by jennifer_weisz - Sat Jul 19 00:42:11 2008
Q. In arbitration there is no corruption, it is less expensive and less time consuming.
Asked by pathy - Sat Jul 19 00:34:27 2008 - Law & Ethics - 4 Answers - Comments
A. Not necessarily. But I'll let you do your own homework.
Answered by jennifer_weisz - Sat Jul 19 00:42:11 2008
Law Homework..?
Q. 31. Cody wants to appeal his case against Digital Corporation to the United States Supreme Court. Cody must ask the Court to issue a writ of a.jurisdiction. b.standing. c.certiorari. d.venue. 32. Edie files a suit against Frank. If this suit is like most cases, it will be a.resolved only after a trial. b.dismissed or settled before a trial. c.settled at a trial. d.dismissed during a trial. 33. Sally and Tom disagree over the amount of money due under their contract. To avoid involving any third party in a resolution of the dispute, Sally and Tom might prefer to use the alternative dispute resolution method of a.arbitration. b.mediation. c.negotiation. d.litigation. 34. Transnational Corporation and United Shipping, Inc., agree to a… [cont.]
Asked by TwI$tdatURmindwontBable2Handle - Sun Jul 27 20:00:13 2008 - Law & Ethics - 2 Answers - Comments
Q. 31. Cody wants to appeal his case against Digital Corporation to the United States Supreme Court. Cody must ask the Court to issue a writ of a.jurisdiction. b.standing. c.certiorari. d.venue. 32. Edie files a suit against Frank. If this suit is like most cases, it will be a.resolved only after a trial. b.dismissed or settled before a trial. c.settled at a trial. d.dismissed during a trial. 33. Sally and Tom disagree over the amount of money due under their contract. To avoid involving any third party in a resolution of the dispute, Sally and Tom might prefer to use the alternative dispute resolution method of a.arbitration. b.mediation. c.negotiation. d.litigation. 34. Transnational Corporation and United Shipping, Inc., agree to a… [cont.]
Asked by TwI$tdatURmindwontBable2Handle - Sun Jul 27 20:00:13 2008 - Law & Ethics - 2 Answers - Comments
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'dispute resolution and arbitration'
Sat Feb 4 08:39:34 2012